<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>i3m Blog &#187; media content</title>
	<atom:link href="http://internal3m.com/CMS/Wordpress/tag/media-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://internal3m.com/CMS/Wordpress</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:54:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>DRM for the Web? Say It Aint So</title>
		<link>http://internal3m.com/CMS/Wordpress/2013/02/13/drm-for-the-web-say-it-aint-so/</link>
		<comments>http://internal3m.com/CMS/Wordpress/2013/02/13/drm-for-the-web-say-it-aint-so/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[..internal..]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internal3m.com/CMS/Wordpress/?p=1728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far it ain’t so, but some form of DRM in HTML is becoming a more likely possibility every day. The W3C’s HTML Working Group recently decided that a proposal to add DRM to HTML media elements — formally known as the Encrypted Media Extensions proposal — is indeed within its purview and the group <a href='http://internal3m.com/CMS/Wordpress/2013/02/13/drm-for-the-web-say-it-aint-so/' class='excerpt-more'>[...]</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/02/drm-for-the-web-say-it-aint-so/"><img src='http://internal3m.com/CMS/Wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/html5logo.jpg' alt='' /></a></p>
<p>So far it ain’t so, but some form of DRM in HTML is becoming a more likely possibility every day.</p>
<p>The W3C’s HTML Working Group recently decided that a proposal to add DRM to HTML media elements — formally known as the Encrypted Media Extensions proposal — is indeed within its purview and the group will be working on it.</p>
<p>That doesn’t mean that the Encrypted Media Extensions proposal will become a standard as is, but it does up the chances that some sort of DRM system will make its way into HTML.</p>
<p>The Encrypted Media Extensions proposal — which is backed by the likes of Google, Microsoft, Netflix and dozens of other media giants — technically does not add DRM to HTML. Instead it defines a framework for bringing a DRM system, or “protected media content” as the current draft puts it, to the web.</p>
<p><strong>MORE: </strong> <a href="http://www.webmonkey.com/2013/02/drm-for-the-web-say-it-aint-so/" target="_blank">DRM for the Web? Say It Aint So | Webmonkey | Wired.com</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://internal3m.com/CMS/Wordpress/2013/02/13/drm-for-the-web-say-it-aint-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>274</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
